Last week the Southern District of New York approved the DOJ’s settlement with Hachette Book Group Inc., HarperCollins Publishers LLC, and Simon & Schuster, Inc. (I previously covered the Apple e-book case here and here.)
Under the Tunney Act, consent settlements with the DOJ are subject to court review and public comment. The three e-book publishers reached a settlement with the DOJ before the Department filed its antitrust suit.
Under the settlement agreements, the publishers must end their e-book agency agreements with Apple within seven days of final judgment. They must also end any contracts with other e-book retailers that prevent them from setting their own prices or include most-favored nation (“MFN”) clauses that guarantee that retail competitors are not receiving better terms. Additionally, under the settlements, distribution provisions limiting retailers’ ability to set e-book pricing are banned for several years.
The DOJ has received hundreds of Tunney Act comments about the settlements. Additionally, Apple, Penguin, and others have filed amicus briefs with the court criticizing one or more aspects of the settlements. Bob Kohn, the founder of eMusic, has been a particularly vocal critic. You may have read about his creative five-page cartoon or graphic novel format brief (which he filed due to the court’s page constraints).
Kohn (and perhaps others) have argued that DOJ essentially accused Amazon of price predation, and that the Apple e-book deals were a lawful and appropriate response to such predation.
Apple, Macmillan, and Penguin remain in the DOJ suit.